Rebels without a cause
Saw 'Tanu weds Manu returns' yesterday.
Excellent movie after a long time. :) (apart from one dimensional Manu and the Haryanvi family as prop.)
I - Restless = humans
It made me think about the trend of lead characters in bollywood movies - men/ women. (Raj in countless SRK films or Kangana in most of her films). They are all spontaneous, restless, rebels (often without a cause). They are also someone who people graciously put up with for the sake of movie's plot.
This is in contrast to lead characters from earlier days. (80s - macho, 70s - angry against system, 60s - stoic silent, graceful). The grace is gone from modern world and modern cinema.
With rise of corporate careers and desk-bound audiences, the lead characters are increasingly 'bubbly' (females leads), 'spunky' (male lead) and are infantile and narcissistic. The more inconsequential and replaceable lives become (of white collar audience), the more spunky and bubbly the characters become in films.
The office goer audience has no real purpose, have no real challenges and benefit a lot from status-quo. That reflects in the content they consume - self help books, identity anxiety soaps, mindless comedies as blockbusters (to avoid critical analysis of their own lives), support to the powerful bhai ("We can be irresponsible and successful too.") and so on.
These office going drones face tremendous existential angst as a result of their digital and desk bound existence.
And when such drones are ripe for pairing, they desire life through their mates. They want life partners who 'do things', who 'are fun', who 'travel', who are 'foodies' and so on.
The reason a drone (Manu) choses a rebel without a cause (Tanu) in the movie, is to ensure that he is marrying a human being. It doesn't matter that she has some serious psychological issues. Her incongruence to societal expectations prove that at least she is a human being, not a drone like him.
People get married in search of life.
II Rebel without a cause
It is essential that there be no cause. A cause will make things too real too quick. The audience of white collar drones 'can't handle the truth.'
All lead characters try to show the middle finger to their immediate environment, but they are always lacking in ambition.
Indians are so scared to identify the elephants in the room that there can be no revolutionary cinema in India. Existential angst is profitable and it doesn't point fingers. The angst is impotent. Speaking of which...
III - Threat to Masculinity
The film subverts masculinity in a way not seen in hindi movies before. All male characters in the film are impotent. All they can do is - 'manage'. (Manu is a loser who never acts or reacts. His sardar friend is literally impotent. Jimmy Shergill has no agency of his own - he flexes his muscles, but all he does is to obey Kangana. The advocate who falls for Kangana, tries to make a scene but is ineffectual.)
When the traditional actors in the theatre of society (patriarchy) stops answering to new realities, new actors (anarchy) will rise to shape the new society.
Excellent movie after a long time. :) (apart from one dimensional Manu and the Haryanvi family as prop.)
I - Restless = humans
It made me think about the trend of lead characters in bollywood movies - men/ women. (Raj in countless SRK films or Kangana in most of her films). They are all spontaneous, restless, rebels (often without a cause). They are also someone who people graciously put up with for the sake of movie's plot.
This is in contrast to lead characters from earlier days. (80s - macho, 70s - angry against system, 60s - stoic silent, graceful). The grace is gone from modern world and modern cinema.
With rise of corporate careers and desk-bound audiences, the lead characters are increasingly 'bubbly' (females leads), 'spunky' (male lead) and are infantile and narcissistic. The more inconsequential and replaceable lives become (of white collar audience), the more spunky and bubbly the characters become in films.
The office goer audience has no real purpose, have no real challenges and benefit a lot from status-quo. That reflects in the content they consume - self help books, identity anxiety soaps, mindless comedies as blockbusters (to avoid critical analysis of their own lives), support to the powerful bhai ("We can be irresponsible and successful too.") and so on.
These office going drones face tremendous existential angst as a result of their digital and desk bound existence.
And when such drones are ripe for pairing, they desire life through their mates. They want life partners who 'do things', who 'are fun', who 'travel', who are 'foodies' and so on.
The reason a drone (Manu) choses a rebel without a cause (Tanu) in the movie, is to ensure that he is marrying a human being. It doesn't matter that she has some serious psychological issues. Her incongruence to societal expectations prove that at least she is a human being, not a drone like him.
People get married in search of life.
II Rebel without a cause
It is essential that there be no cause. A cause will make things too real too quick. The audience of white collar drones 'can't handle the truth.'
All lead characters try to show the middle finger to their immediate environment, but they are always lacking in ambition.
Indians are so scared to identify the elephants in the room that there can be no revolutionary cinema in India. Existential angst is profitable and it doesn't point fingers. The angst is impotent. Speaking of which...
III - Threat to Masculinity
The film subverts masculinity in a way not seen in hindi movies before. All male characters in the film are impotent. All they can do is - 'manage'. (Manu is a loser who never acts or reacts. His sardar friend is literally impotent. Jimmy Shergill has no agency of his own - he flexes his muscles, but all he does is to obey Kangana. The advocate who falls for Kangana, tries to make a scene but is ineffectual.)
When the traditional actors in the theatre of society (patriarchy) stops answering to new realities, new actors (anarchy) will rise to shape the new society.
Comments