Skip to main content

Impose a worldview and see the world implode

When you look at the history of middle east, you realise one thing - The mess we are in today, is in REACTION to impositions of ideas alien to the natives.
For example -
1. King Shah of Iran forced secularism on a people for whom their religiosity was important. The reaction was the cultural revolution that overthrew the monarch and installed in its stead a religious leader at the helm of a nation.
2. Erdogan is turning a secular state into an Islamic state in Turkey with fairly popular support. This is in reaction to Ataturk's imposition of secularism in the first half of 20th century.
3. Saudi Arabia's extremist version of Islam is propelled elsewhere, in part because people feel their religiosity is under threat from western imperialism. And obviously, the Saudi monarchs are well aware of the case of another monarch in Iran being ousted who suppressed religion. So they double down on religious fervour and have weaponised the world view.
4. and ofcourse the whole mess in Palestine where a group of people was transplanted from afar and the natives continue to be subjugated.
5. ISIS emerged from the power vacuum that US left behind.

The point is - it never ends well when you impose a world view on others.Unless...

Unless, you make your worldview a desirable worldview for others too, first. The new worldview must also become the people's new and desirable identity shared by the majority.
Well, it might pay off, if you are really committed to it in a constructive manner. For example, a coup by the army of Turkey to install secularism is not going to work. But if there were secular civic institutions that helped people grow, connect and prosper - probably that would have helped them better. Secondly, it can't be a urban area-only project. all attaturk created was an urban population who found more reasons to look down upon the rural/ religious populace. Unequal growth in wealth as well as worldviews, is the real recipe of social engineering disasters. 

And that is also why secularism cannot win unless it follows shared economic prosperity. For the leader to remain in power, it is easier for him to support and leverage existing worldviews. It is expensive and risky to alter worldviews of a people. 

So if I take this understanding and look at India.

1. BJP's win and Congress' decimation - logical conclusion to faux-socialistic ideals that didn't actually reach people. But with all the impositions by BJP, their position might not be as secure as people think.

2. The fissures in India will get more pronounced - Dalits, muslims who are branded as anti-nationals and cow-slaughterers will react in whichever capacity they can.

3. Imposition of Hindi -  Northeast, South - half the country will react with more fervour for regional languages and identities. For starters, Karnataka wants a state flag now.

4. Imposition of aadhaar card/ digital banking - See the rise of alternate exchanges - proliferation of cash, new currency?, bogus data jamming the system, major disturbances when hackers make use of the leaky database...

5. Demonetisation - Migrant incomes in severe distress. Will that lead to diffused disturbances as desperate men try to make ends meet?

For 70 years, the liberals in powerful positions of media and policy have been trying to hold together a billion people with ideals of secularism. However, the secularism came crumbling down within three years of rule of the majoritarian Hindutva party. The urban intellectuals, who controlled media so far, had ceded control to the right wing nut jobs.
It was bound to happen, because the worldviews radioed out of Mumbai and Delhi were too self-indulgent, too urbane. India of Mumbai/Delhi and India of rest-of-India were different worlds.

This also explains why caste still remains relevant in 21st century in India. Since the wealth and worldviews haven't traveled far beyond bigger cities, the older socio-economic structure prevails. A known devil is better than an unknown one. besides, the one who are in power have no incentive to change power-structure. The subjugated are terribly weak to do anything about it.

The flexible, pliable worldviews of corporates - western corporates who adopted and leveraged regional sensibilities, grew. The ones who tried to 'educate' and 'upgrade' consumers, failed.


Popular posts from this blog

I am a salmon

I am a salmon. It's been a decade away from my hometown, and yet my dreams refuse to relocate along with me. When sleep hasn't claimed me yet, but neither am I awake, you may find me in Nasik.
My senses fall back into their default states of Nasik when in-between. The space is of my home in Nasik, the sight is of the things around it. I might be hungry and thinking of eating a laddoo and my hands reach out for the steel dabba stacked on an elevated wooden cupboard stuck on the left wall of kitchen. In my mind's eye, I grope for the dabba momentarily as the search yields nothing - poof. the image disintegrates. I am snapped back to reality with a mild jolt. My mind reminds me of the layout in my own kitchen. There is no airborne shelf, there is no steel container, there is no laddoo. It says, go back to sleep. and I do.


I shifted 3.5k km for a less polluted and less dangerous city a year ago.
And all was good. I get to walk and how I love to walk. I am truly happi…

Why I repair my shoe

I have 3 shoes. One formal, One sport shoe and another a mix of the two. The last one is particularly awesome, cause of its uniqueness. It looks like a formal shoe, but is as comfortable and flexible as a sport shoe. I bought it for my first job in Mumbai. I was newly rich and was expected to behave like one. I found this gem of pure black leather in a Colaba Causeway showroom. Quite a find. But its been almost two years now and the shoe shows its age. For all its awesomeness, its quite a weak shoe, to give out so early. I have stitched it, got new laces, and strengthened its sole. It doesn't look shiny anymore cause the leather has suffered from a few hostile trespasses. I think, like a man, things too should be allowed to carry their scars. Shiny scar-less men are just so... irrelevant. 

Since childhood, I have been used to using things for long times. Clothes, equipments, shoes etc. I can't just throw things away cause they don't look as good anymore or they don't w…

Reading India through 'Dictator's handbook'

What's the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship?
The book says, not much. India, agrees. Current political dispensation especially agrees vigorously.

"Soma" of hindutva and past glory + divided impoverished amnesiac masses + legitimised attack on individual rights + tremendous wealth shared among few = brave new world of oligarchical India.

Essentially, democracies/ dictatorships etc., are simply variants of the same power dynamic between the ruler, essentials, influentials and inter-changeables.

Interchangeables are the nominal selectorate - the individual voters who have nominal (or cosmetic) power to choose leader - most of us.
Influentials  are the real selectorate - the guys who really choose the leader. In US recently, the electoral college famously went against the popular vote and elected a clown as their president instead. In India, theoretically, the system is a bit better in terms of a wider base of influentials - it could be religious gurus, party…