Skip to main content

The one ring to rule them all


The only truly successful meme of 21st century is that of 'Money'.

Successful because no other idea has been accepted with such unanimity as the idea of money. A paper with little value becomes fantastically valuable with a photo of Mahatma Gandhi. (or a fish or watch tower if you are from Norway.) And this transformation happens because humanity has collectively agreed to bestow imaginary value upon real substance. 

No other idea comes close to the level of acceptance that the idea of Money enjoys. More and more people identify themselves as atheists (so there goes religion). Not everyone believes in equality (the idea of caste refuses to die, The idea of class remains a reality. People are forever trying to find imaginary cues to set themselves favourably apart from the masses). The rise of ISIS and resurgence of Nazi sympathies tells us that idea of democracy and human rights are not as strong as we think they are.


Money is the one ring to rule them all. 
Ideas that serve the idea of money will prosper. Ideas that pose a threat to money, will be reduced to insignificance. Take the example of the idea of Human Rights. It will forever be an underdog: Little islands at the margins fighting the battle against bigger interests at the center. Ideas like these will never die (well, at least until humanity exists), but they will never assume center stage as well.

So what exactly is the idea of money? 
Essentially, it is a medium of transaction. From paper, plastic and now to bitcoins..  the concept is moving from material transaction to conceptual transaction. For the idea of money, a material person is not essential anymore. A virtual 'want' is enough.
Is it essentially convenience of transaction. Transaction between humans. So what does it mean for humanity? For it to be irrelevant materially, but relevant existentially in the age of virtual worlds?

Centrality of banks
No wonder, bankers are the highest paid mammals on the planet. They control the flow of money. They control the idea of money. And with globalisations and digitisation, banks are central to all human activity. Without them, the system as it currently stands, will fall down.

Power at the centre
The 0.1% of the human population controls the world. The one ring gives them all the power. To fight them, support alternate ideas of money.
 
An alternate Future is P2P
Bitcoins and other p2p mined virtual currencies operate outside the banking system. But how resilient is the idea of p2p transactions? The nascent system has had its share of troubles. But the idea seems to be inevitable.
If there is global centralised banking at the centre, then there must be P2P virtual money at the opposite pole. The future of money is bipolar. and we can't afford either of the systems to be too powerful.

The new science of economics
Economics as a subject to be studied is a fairly new idea. That tells you something crucial about money. This means that the momentum behind the idea of money is fairly new. With globalisation, money became important. Which means, it wasn't that important earlier. Which means, the idea of non money-centric life is not that far fetched. that there is a possibility of money to be reined in.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I repair my shoe

I have 3 shoes. One formal, One sport shoe and another a mix of the two. The last one is particularly awesome, cause of its uniqueness. It looks like a formal shoe, but is as comfortable and flexible as a sport shoe. I bought it for my first job in Mumbai. I was newly rich and was expected to behave like one. I found this gem of pure black leather in a Colaba Causeway showroom. Quite a find. But its been almost two years now and the shoe shows its age. For all its awesomeness, its quite a weak shoe, to give out so early. I have stitched it, got new laces, and strengthened its sole. It doesn't look shiny anymore cause the leather has suffered from a few hostile trespasses. I think, like a man, things too should be allowed to carry their scars. Shiny scar-less men are just so... irrelevant. 

Since childhood, I have been used to using things for long times. Clothes, equipments, shoes etc. I can't just throw things away cause they don't look as good anymore or they don't w…

Walk about - II

I have been living in Gurgaon for the last 5 years. 5 years! in Gurgaon! I never thought I would end up staying this long here. In my head, it always was just a transit camp - to earn money to fund travel to Himalayas, come back and refill, go back and chill.. repeat until one figures out a way to break out of the cycle.
For the first 2 odd years that reflected in my lifestyle - My house was small and barely functional, a temporary base camp to return to 'home' in the hills. That 'home' was among strangers in the farthest corners and alleys of small villages in the hills. The home was not peopled really. It had no walls. It was the crisp cool air of the hills, the majesty of Himalaya, the clarity of sun's rays, the hot vapours rising from the ginger tea and the never ending walks in the forests, up the hills, down the valleys and through gullies and alleys of small villages and towns. When I was alone, that's what home was for me: A living breathing intimate …

Reading India through 'Dictator's handbook'

What's the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship?
The book says, not much. India, agrees. Current political dispensation especially agrees vigorously.

"Soma" of hindutva and past glory + divided impoverished amnesiac masses + legitimised attack on individual rights + tremendous wealth shared among few = brave new world of oligarchical India.


Essentially, democracies/ dictatorships etc., are simply variants of the same power dynamic between the ruler, essentials, influentials and inter-changeables.

Interchangeables are the nominal selectorate - the individual voters who have nominal (or cosmetic) power to choose leader - most of us.
Influentials  are the real selectorate - the guys who really choose the leader. In US recently, the electoral college famously went against the popular vote and elected a clown as their president instead. In India, theoretically, the system is a bit better in terms of a wider base of influentials - it could be religious gurus, party…