Skip to main content

Not enough likes for Myntra's 'Live for likes'


Myntra is asking us to 'live for likes'. But should it? and should we?
I will come to that in a bit, but first the ok enough parts.

Imagery.
The imagery seems alright for a fashion brand (myntra = fashion brand?).
Beautiful young people shot in various circumstances.
The operating insight for the imagery was 'selfies'. Sure the brand world has discovered that insight now.. at least 2 years late.

Error #1. Missed the zeitgeist bus.  

This is a lazy interpretation of a powerful insight. If it is late, it at least should be powerfully executed or reinterpreted in a new way.Why are people taking selfies? How does it relate to their self esteem? How can Myntra inspire consumers through selfies?
ok. so it was just an √°rtistic device'. But why have divergence in device and tagline.

Error #2. Misunderstanding the function of branding 
I want to talk about the misplaced insight behind 'live for likes'.

My assumption is fashion advertising is aspirational. Well, all advertising is, but fashion more so. Raymond suits make you day dream of being the understated billionaire who is also a sensitive family man. Patek Phillips creates an illusion of formidable lineage for you.

What day dream does Myntra inspire? that a selfie would get 200+ likes?
the poverty of that aspiration is astounding. While it may be true about a certain number of chronically depressed people who shop to feel good about themselves, that is not an aspirational personality.

(well, if you burn cash, you will get awareness. that shouldn't be a measure of how  good your communication is.) 

Error #3.Misunderstanding the TG

So who is this communication aimed at? For whom is this aspirational?
For people who want to feel young (young = social network native). ? ( While it may 'seem' to be a youthful (to the old folks) to talk about likes, there are better ways to convey youthfulness (if that was a brief).)

For people who are only now going online. earning new users.
For people who feel a digital lifestyle is a passport to better life (those who are not digitally active now - the lower middle class middle age.)
Who wants to be a person who 'lives for likes'? Not me. and I have spent thousands with Myntra.


The fundamental error here is taking a user behavior as is, instead of examining the reason for that behavior. Taking a trend (an old one at that) and portraying it as is will do nothing for your brand.(there's no way in hell, this positioning came from a true digital native. It came from a old person who is mystified by this new behavior of online self validation.)
Possible positioning planks could have come from the reasons why a person seeks validation through facebook likes. Or through the persona that people tend to 'like'.
If you must hold a mirror to a user behavior.. that behavior should be a positive behavior that validates user's sense of self. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I repair my shoe

I have 3 shoes. One formal, One sport shoe and another a mix of the two. The last one is particularly awesome, cause of its uniqueness. It looks like a formal shoe, but is as comfortable and flexible as a sport shoe. I bought it for my first job in Mumbai. I was newly rich and was expected to behave like one. I found this gem of pure black leather in a Colaba Causeway showroom. Quite a find. But its been almost two years now and the shoe shows its age. For all its awesomeness, its quite a weak shoe, to give out so early. I have stitched it, got new laces, and strengthened its sole. It doesn't look shiny anymore cause the leather has suffered from a few hostile trespasses. I think, like a man, things too should be allowed to carry their scars. Shiny scar-less men are just so... irrelevant. 

Since childhood, I have been used to using things for long times. Clothes, equipments, shoes etc. I can't just throw things away cause they don't look as good anymore or they don't w…

Walk about - II

I have been living in Gurgaon for the last 5 years. 5 years! in Gurgaon! I never thought I would end up staying this long here. In my head, it always was just a transit camp - to earn money to fund travel to Himalayas, come back and refill, go back and chill.. repeat until one figures out a way to break out of the cycle.
For the first 2 odd years that reflected in my lifestyle - My house was small and barely functional, a temporary base camp to return to 'home' in the hills. That 'home' was among strangers in the farthest corners and alleys of small villages in the hills. The home was not peopled really. It had no walls. It was the crisp cool air of the hills, the majesty of Himalaya, the clarity of sun's rays, the hot vapours rising from the ginger tea and the never ending walks in the forests, up the hills, down the valleys and through gullies and alleys of small villages and towns. When I was alone, that's what home was for me: A living breathing intimate …

Reading India through 'Dictator's handbook'

What's the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship?
The book says, not much. India, agrees. Current political dispensation especially agrees vigorously.

"Soma" of hindutva and past glory + divided impoverished amnesiac masses + legitimised attack on individual rights + tremendous wealth shared among few = brave new world of oligarchical India.


Essentially, democracies/ dictatorships etc., are simply variants of the same power dynamic between the ruler, essentials, influentials and inter-changeables.

Interchangeables are the nominal selectorate - the individual voters who have nominal (or cosmetic) power to choose leader - most of us.
Influentials  are the real selectorate - the guys who really choose the leader. In US recently, the electoral college famously went against the popular vote and elected a clown as their president instead. In India, theoretically, the system is a bit better in terms of a wider base of influentials - it could be religious gurus, party…