Skip to main content

Scratch that Label

Chomsky apparently is a 'Contrarian'. Amartya Sen is 'anti growth'. 
Labels come easy, comprehension not so.
Chomsky is 84 and Amartya Sen is 79 - Both have spent major part of their lives in bringing to light facts and ideas that the mainstream and the powerful want to dust under the carpet. They are not attention seekers and side show freaks. They are heroes, the few brave ones who are fighting for well being of people through justice and truth. 
and these heroes get branded as 'Contrarian' and 'anti growth'. The question to be asked is - by whom? Often these are people who don't read enough or don't read what should be read. They do not (or don't want to) comprehend the effect of ideas.(who benefits? how so? at what cost?). The ones whose source of perspective is Arnab Goswami and such other sensationalist prime time TV trash. For them, ideas are like fashionable clothes or a recent movie - useful as social conversations and nothing beyond that. They are the ones without questions and with outrage.
But the labels aren't created by these viewers and consumers of prime time TV. The labels are the creation of propaganda teams of the powerful. 
But why create labels?
A label is curiously potent. It is a pithy uni-dimensional vector that is directed away from comprehension and towards self-serving conclusions. The conclusions come before the analysis and that is the whole point - To short circuit the process of logic and fact finding. The interest comes first, then the necessary conclusion and then the strategy is formulated to seed ideas that obfuscate and serve an interest. 
Its like in advertising - For example, a fast food brand might want to sell their burgers to young children. The fact is - processed junk food is bad for health in the context of current consumptive patterns. However, no one wants to be burdened with worries and considerations. Consumers want simplicity. Marketers know that. and hence, the brand would supersede the health conversation with the vague but intrinsically more appealing idea of happiness. Hence 'open happiness' and 'i am loving it' and so on. That way the real question is completely subverted. The source of the best advertising is typically the most basic insights into human insecurities and desires - not necessarily in the sharp product truth. Though if those two can be married, then nothing better than that.

With ideas that affect life beyond consumption, similar strategies are used by propagandists: GM foods are apparently 'inevitable' and 'beneficial'. (ya right.) Activists who try to bring sanity to the table, sanity that might be harmful to the interest of the multi-billion dollar marketing of corporates are sidelined with use of sharp labels - labels that serve the function of disarming the activist. Check out this video interview of Vandana Shiva. 


See how the interviewer tries to belittle Vandana's work by reducing her to a label - 'tree hugger'. With those two words, the anchor tries to portray Vandana as a fringe lunatic. The tone and manner of the anchor is that of a grown up woman astounded by her daughter's naivete. Whereas, the conversation shows how well grounded Vandana's argument is while the anchor keeps on talking of one thing - yield. Even when the anchor fails, the label allows for the predisposed among the audience to disregard Vandana's arguments as fringe nonsense.

That is the power of Label. It enables status-quo. 
It is a powerful force that destroys the many facets of an identity and reduces people & ideas to simplistic and impotent curiosities. 
In the world of images, self-branding is aspirational. Absence of a short hand to describe oneself is seen as an handicap. The inability to see oneself as embodiment of a single idea is cause for the 'quarter life crisis' (BTW, QLC is bullshit. its just the cocktail of frenziedness and image crisis, that is independent of age and a function of our mediated minds. pull off the plug.)
"I am a painter." "I am a Hindu." "I am a communist"
Is that all that you are? Must you be a monolithic abstraction?


So fight labeling. So that sanity prevails. So that you many not fall prey to ridiculous identity crisis. So that we may choose wisely. 

How to fight labelling? 
Embrace complexity.  we live in a complex, intertwined world. so its obvious that there would be forces and effects unseen & far off. When possible and certainly for things important to you, embrace the consciousness of the complexity of your choices. Be suspicious of overly simplified explanation of acts, decisions, events.
I guess asking questions, being curious is the key. Using logic and common sense instead of accepting what is being said is important. Even more important i guess is to know which questions to raise. Often many times, idle questioning is a tool to obfuscate rather than bring clarity. So ask questions that lead to clarity of thought, not to entertain thoughts or to posture. 
Curiosity led questions as against argumentative questions
Questions for clarity as against questions that confuse. 
Questions that go deeper as against questions that spread wider. 

(I am embarrassed right now, writing such obvious things.. as if this is a self - help blog. (god forbid!))

anyways.. any ideas that you care to share?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I am a salmon

I am a salmon. It's been a decade away from my hometown, and yet my dreams refuse to relocate along with me. When sleep hasn't claimed me yet, but neither am I awake, you may find me in Nasik.
My senses fall back into their default states of Nasik when in-between. The space is of my home in Nasik, the sight is of the things around it. I might be hungry and thinking of eating a laddoo and my hands reach out for the steel dabba stacked on an elevated wooden cupboard stuck on the left wall of kitchen. In my mind's eye, I grope for the dabba momentarily as the search yields nothing - poof. the image disintegrates. I am snapped back to reality with a mild jolt. My mind reminds me of the layout in my own kitchen. There is no airborne shelf, there is no steel container, there is no laddoo. It says, go back to sleep. and I do.

_____

I shifted 3.5k km for a less polluted and less dangerous city a year ago.
And all was good. I get to walk and how I love to walk. I am truly happi…

Exercises for a smarter nation

We, the people, are gullible idiots. C'mon, admit it. We have all been bullied into bad deals by powerful charlatans at some point or another. Governments are no different. The current one is getting away with our personal data and going about distributing our public resources and monies to its favourite cronies.This is no exceptional government. This happens all the time, in all the countries - to varying degrees. The varying part is important. I would much rather be in Norway where the leeway for such giveaways against the interest of public is small, compared to Angola and Nigeria where the oil bonanza instead has become oil curse.

One of the important ways for moving towards Norway and away from Nigeria is for the public to become aware and educated about power. Education is a bad word now - what India creates in not educated people, it creates literate minions. By educated, i mean people who can reason, who can think critically, who can see the world from different perspecti…

Withdrawal symptoms

Ctrl-tab
Ctrl-tab...
Scroll Scroll Scoll..
Alt-tab
Alt-tab...
Catch yourself slipping away.

Deep  breath. 

Close the browser. silence the mobile and turn it away.

Open an offline-real-paper diary. Stop your thighs from lolling impatiently. Stay still. 

Pick up a pen awkwardly. ahh, the fingers are stiff. It will take a  while for them to get used to holding a pen. Quick finger exercise - open the palm, stretch finger outwards, close into a fist, dig the fingers in. Repeat.
Ok now.. about to pick up the pen again, but eyes dart towards the screen. Tempted to check email.

Shut up. The last consequential email came two months ago. Nothing of consequence is online.

Pick up the pen. Don't fetishize the object now. Get on with it. Put it on paper, write a word and start it already. If I get to a sentence, perhaps I will get into a flow and won't have to look up from the paper at all. 

One sentence later.

Ahh. That was good. I am feeling good about myself. The sentence makes sense. …