Skip to main content

Marketer's assault on our Language 2: "Evolution" / "Educate"

Marketer's assault on our Language = MAOL

What do you do to wash your behind in the washroom? Do you trust your hands to do the job with water, or do you use paper?
One day in college, a Chinese professor talked about this pertinent question when talking about cultural differences. She talked about how people see tissue paper as an essential solution, while there is an ecologically better solution 'at hand!'. The students were surprised with her point of view.
Most of the students hailing from Indian metros, saw the tissue as a better alternative, a logical next step to the 'primitive' practice of washing with hands. That was one of the easy ways to differentiate oneself from the lower classes. The upper class is the one that has access to western lifestyle, which in Indian imagination is a 'step up', a logical next step.
But this was different. This was a Chinese lifestyle too. (which is fairly absent from Indian imagination and hence exotic). and here was a Chinese woman with a whole new perspective -  she saw the difference in practice as just that - a difference. She, as a matter of fact was advocating to Chinese people to adopt this 'India practice' to save the millions of trees that get cut to produce the tissue papers.

So which cultural practices are just 'different' and which ones are really 'better', the logical improvements that differentiate between 'primitive' and 'modern'?

Use of sanitary napkins seems to be certainly a better solution than the traditional practices.
But is the use of diapers for infants really better? The cost notwithstanding (current prices make it a upper class product), how does it affect the child's health, its daily routine, the parent child dynamic?
How about fairness creams (for the face, vagina, arm pits and god knows what next) products for women? Are they essentials or unwarranted monstrosities hoisted on people by marketers who are exploiting our deepest insecurities?
Dove especially is an excellent example of a brand that has mastered doublespeak. On the one hand, by creating products that target insecurities it is creating 'new needs' (who in India wanted to have shaved arm pits 10 years back?) while communicating it in the garb of female empowerment. Its genius! The best of the marketing brands in the world are doing the same kind of doublespeak.

Central to this doublespeak is the assumption of linear development. It is the assumption that with time, all human interventions have been for the better. It is a basic premise for advertising - a new product in never merely good, it is 'better'. With the new vocabulary of 'versions', it is now getting even more deeply entrenched - the notion of continuous improvement, of development, of 'evolution'.
That brings me to today's word - Evolution.

Olive oil, cheese, razors, mouthwash, junk food, cola drink, a billion skin creams... marketers of most of these categories talk of Indian market as something in need of evolution. The westerns patterns of consumption being the logical next step for the burgeoning Indian middle class.
Dig through quotes by FMCG marketers in the leading financial dailies of India. Many of the FMCG marketers use the word 'evolution' at least once when they talk about growth in India.
Shampoo brands feel that Indians are just not worried enough about their split ends as much as they should be.
Cola drink brands feel that Indians will surely 'evolve' their meals to feature cola drinks in it.
Fast food brands feel that Indians need to be 'educated' about processed food 'meals' that are apparently 'healthy'.
Milk brand feels that Indians need to be 'educated' about the benefit of processed milk that might be 2-3 month old, over the regular practice of drinking fresh local milk. (Completely beats me, why are people shifting to this expensive and stale option.)
Whisky brand feels that Indians need to be 'educated' about the various silly variations and processes of alcohol making, and be ready to spend twice/ thrice for the marginal change (not necessarily improvement) over the product.
Chocolate brand feels that Indians should 'evolve' from their traditional sweets to chocolates. 
and so on... 
 None of these advocated changes are any better than current Indian practices. They are certainly not 'evolved' practices that are making lives better. They are simply new markets - the blue ocean of newer and newer insecurities and concerns.
The new notion of the word 'evolution' perhaps is not about the notion of improvement at all, but merely the burgeoning appetite for consumption.
Evolution is the new euphemism coined by marketers to mean, unwarranted changes in lifestyle towards obsessive consumption.


Popular posts from this blog

Why I repair my shoe

I have 3 shoes. One formal, One sport shoe and another a mix of the two. The last one is particularly awesome, cause of its uniqueness. It looks like a formal shoe, but is as comfortable and flexible as a sport shoe. I bought it for my first job in Mumbai. I was newly rich and was expected to behave like one. I found this gem of pure black leather in a Colaba Causeway showroom. Quite a find. But its been almost two years now and the shoe shows its age. For all its awesomeness, its quite a weak shoe, to give out so early. I have stitched it, got new laces, and strengthened its sole. It doesn't look shiny anymore cause the leather has suffered from a few hostile trespasses. I think, like a man, things too should be allowed to carry their scars. Shiny scar-less men are just so... irrelevant. 

Since childhood, I have been used to using things for long times. Clothes, equipments, shoes etc. I can't just throw things away cause they don't look as good anymore or they don't w…

Walk about - II

I have been living in Gurgaon for the last 5 years. 5 years! in Gurgaon! I never thought I would end up staying this long here. In my head, it always was just a transit camp - to earn money to fund travel to Himalayas, come back and refill, go back and chill.. repeat until one figures out a way to break out of the cycle.
For the first 2 odd years that reflected in my lifestyle - My house was small and barely functional, a temporary base camp to return to 'home' in the hills. That 'home' was among strangers in the farthest corners and alleys of small villages in the hills. The home was not peopled really. It had no walls. It was the crisp cool air of the hills, the majesty of Himalaya, the clarity of sun's rays, the hot vapours rising from the ginger tea and the never ending walks in the forests, up the hills, down the valleys and through gullies and alleys of small villages and towns. When I was alone, that's what home was for me: A living breathing intimate …

Reading India through 'Dictator's handbook'

What's the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship?
The book says, not much. India, agrees. Current political dispensation especially agrees vigorously.

"Soma" of hindutva and past glory + divided impoverished amnesiac masses + legitimised attack on individual rights + tremendous wealth shared among few = brave new world of oligarchical India.

Essentially, democracies/ dictatorships etc., are simply variants of the same power dynamic between the ruler, essentials, influentials and inter-changeables.

Interchangeables are the nominal selectorate - the individual voters who have nominal (or cosmetic) power to choose leader - most of us.
Influentials  are the real selectorate - the guys who really choose the leader. In US recently, the electoral college famously went against the popular vote and elected a clown as their president instead. In India, theoretically, the system is a bit better in terms of a wider base of influentials - it could be religious gurus, party…